Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 23;36(3):235–243. doi: 10.3343/alm.2016.36.3.235

Table 1. Prevalence of hVISA* and VSSA phenotypes based on the macromethod E test and the vancomycin MIC of standard E test.

Vancomycin MIC (µg/mL) MRSA (N=138) MSSA (N=91)
hVISA* (%) VSSA (%) hVISA* (%) VSSA (%)
0.25 0 (-) 0 (-) 0 (-) 1 (0.0)
0.5 0 (-) 7 (100.0) 0 (-) 0 (-)
0.75 1 (14.3) 6 (85.7) 1 (16.7) 5 (83.3)
1 22 (42.3) 30 (57.7) 0 (-) 45 (100.0)
1.5 38 (61.3) 24 (38.7) 7 (18.9) 30 (81.1)
2 8 (88.9) 1 (11.1) 1 (50.0) 1 (50.0)
3 1 (100.0) 0 (-) 0 (-) 0 (-)
Total 70 (50.7) 68 (49.3) 9 (9.9) 82 (90.1)

hVISA prevalences according to the vancomycin MICs were significantly different in MRSA (P=0.0007) and MSSA (P=0.0149) isolates. Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square test by 2×N table format.

*hVISA phenotype was identified by macromethod E test; Vancomycin MICs were determined by standard E test.

Abbreviations: VSSA, vancomycin-susceptible S. aureus; hVISA, heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus; MRSA, methicillin-resistant S. aureus; MSSA, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus.