Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 29;10:142–150. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2016.01.013

Table 6.

Pairwise comparison of Paenibacillus ihumii with other species using GGDC, formula 2 (DDH estimates based on identities/HSP length)a

Paenibacillus ihumii Paenibacillus fonticola Paenibacillus peoriae Paenibacillus stellifer Paenibacillus terrae Paenibacillus borealis
P. ihumii 100% 28% ± 2.43 17.5% ± 2.23 18.2% ± 2.26 17.6% ± 2.23 17.6% ± 2.24
P. fonticola 100% 16.8% ± 2.21 17.1% ± 2.22 17.2% ± 2.22 17% ± 2.22
P. peoriae 100% 18.2% ± 2.26 33.7% ± 2.47 18.1% ± 2.75
P. stellifer 100% 18.3% ± 2.26 19.7% ± 2.3
P. terrae 100% 18.1% ± 2.25
P. borealis 100%
a

Confidence intervals indicate inherent uncertainty in estimating DDH values from intergenomic distances based on models derived from empirical test data sets (which are always limited in size). These results are in accordance with the 16S rRNA and phylogenomic analyses as well as the GGDC results. DDH, DNA-DNA hybridization; GGDC, Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator; HSP, high-scoring segment pairs.