Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 12;31:481–492. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2475-4

Table 4.

Older and younger age groupings

Study Age groups in study Younger group (N) Older group (N)
Takaoa <40
41–60b
>60
<40 (58) >60 (17)
Pescatori <45
>45
<45 (123) >45 (33)
Dayton <55
>55
<55 (423) >55 (32)
Chapmanc <45
46–55b
>55
<45 (1688) >55 (65)
Delaneyc, d, e <45
46-55b
56-65
>65
<45(1323) >55 (168)
Sun Hoc, d <30
30-49
50-69
>70
<50 (227) >50 (103)
Lewisc <50
>50
<50 (18) >50 (18)
Bauerc <50
>50
<50 (326) >50 (66)
Tanc, d <50
>50
<50 (199) >50 (28)
Total 4327 513

aOutcomes compared: anorectal physiology, patient satisfaction, incontinence scoring system, otherwise excluded in analysis

bPatient group excluded as spanning cut-off

cStudies included in sensitivity analysis

dStudies included in 65 ± 5 analysis

eStudies with >10 years follow-up