Table 2.

Pairwise comparisons for post-pre estimates.

Question	Pairwise comparison	Est.	SE	z-score	p value	L95%	U95%
(1) The goals of the rotation were defined	Stanford-Valley	0.31	0.17	1.86	0.063	−0.02	0.64
	Stanford-VA General	0.11	0.17	0.66	0.507	−0.22	0.44
(2) The goals of the rotation were achieved	Stanford-Valley	0.37	0.16	2.26	0.024	0.05	0.69
	Stanford-VA General	0.18	0.16	1.14	0.256	−0.13	0.48
(3) Quality of the syllabus	Stanford-Valley	0.39	0.19	2.10	0.037	0.02	0.76
	Stanford-VA General	0.12	0.18	0.65	0.515	−0.23	0.46
(4) Were the cases of educational value	Stanford-Valley	0.43	0.16	2.73	0.007	0.12	0.73
	Stanford-VA General	0.35	0.14	2.43	0.016	0.07	0.64
(5) Clinical teaching	Stanford-Valley	0.48	0.16	2.91	0.004	0.15	0.80
	Stanford-VA General	0.43	0.14	3.12	0.002	0.16	0.69
(6) Teaching not directly involved with case management	Stanford-Valley	0.90	0.21	4.34	0.000	0.49	1.30
	Stanford-VA General	0.49	0.17	2.97	0.003	0.17	0.82
(7) Feedback provided	Stanford-Valley	0.51	0.19	2.63	0.009	0.13	0.89
	Stanford-VA General	0.23	0.17	1.41	0.160	−0.09	0.56
(8) Overall teaching quality of this rotation	Stanford-Valley	0.45	0.16	2.79	0.005	0.13	0.76
	Stanford-VA General	0.40	0.14	2.87	0.004	0.13	0.67