Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 2;3:5. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2016.00005

Table 1.

Mapping data: data of electrical mapping study during Langendorff perfusion.

Sham TAC
All TAC+ TAC−
RV θL (cm s−1) 68.6 ± 2.4 67.1 ± 3.4 65.2 ± 4.6 70.1 ± 5.3
RV θT (cm s−1) 43.4 ± 2.3 39.0 ± 1.9 41.1 ± 2.5 35.6 ± 2.7
RV anisotropic ratio 1.64 ± 0.10 1.75 ± 0.09 1.60 ± 0.11 1.98 ± 0.09
RV ERP (ms) 45.4 ± 2.7 54.6 ± 3.9 60.0 ± 5.3 46.0 ± 2.4
RV DoC (cm s−1) 1.21 ± 0.088 1.32 ± 0.13 1.40 ± 0.20 1.20 ± 0.12
LV θL (cm s−1) 62.8 ± 5.7 68.9 ± 3.3 64.3 ± 4.9 74.5 ± 3.5
LV θT (cm s−1) 27.5 ± 2.5 27.9 ± 2.7 26.8 ± 3.2 29.2 ± 5.1
LV anisotropic ratio 2.29 ± 0.13 2.63 ± 0.20 2.48 ± 0.22 2.80 ± 0.38
LV ERP (ms) 59.1 ± 4.1 67.5 ± 3.3 65.7 ± 4.8 70.0 ± 4.5
LV DoC (cm s−1) 1.23 ± 0.075 1.90 ± 0.087* 2.10 ± 0.060 1.64 ± 0.12
LV θTM (cm s−1) 58.5 ± 3.9 37.6 ± 2.9* 35.0 ± 4.8 40.7 ± 2.9

RV/LV, right and left ventricle, respectively; θLTTM, conduction velocity longitudinal, transversal, or perpendicular to epicardial fiber direction, respectively, at pacing cycle length of 150 ms; ERP, effective refractory period; DoC, dispersion of conduction.

*P < 0.01 vs. sham; P < 0.01 vs. TAC−.

Significant comparisons are highlighted in bold.