Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 29;310(5):E346–E354. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00485.2015

Table 1.

Lipid profile of mice fed a HFD and HFD supplemented with CA

WT Ucpl-KO WT + CA Ucp1-KO + CA
TAG, mmol/l 0.77 ± 0.03 0.98 ± 0.17 0.84 ± 0.04 1.08 ± 0.13
TC, mmol/l 4.66 ± 0.28 4.36 ± 0.26 3.89 ± 0.28 3.80 ± 0.12
HDL, mmol/l 2.32 ± 0.05 2.21 ± 0.09 1.28 ± 0.34 2.03 ± 0.11
Non-HDL, mmol/l 2.34 ± 0.26 2.15 ± 0.0.18 2.59 ± 0.52 1.77 ± 0.08
ALT, U/l 33.48 ± 4.72 28.98 ± 5.15 171.4 ± 52.54 57.62 ± 14.40

Data are presented as means ± SE; n = 5–6.

HFD, high-fat diet; CA, cholic acid; WT, wild type; Ucpl, uncoupling protein 1; KO, knockout; TAG, triacylglycerol; TC, total cholesterol; ALT, alanine transaminase.

Plasma levels of TAG, TC, HDL, and non-HDL are the difference between TC and HDL and ALT. Differences between groups were analyzed by 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple test.