Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan;7(1-2):27–35. doi: 10.18632/genesandcancer.96

Table 3. Association between RTK/RAS-related genes and clinical outcome.

OS PFS
N Median, months (95%CI) HR (95%CI)a HR (95%CI)b Median, (95%CI) HR (95%CI)a HR (95%CI)b
KRAS
Wild type 144 14.9 (12.3–18.3) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 7.3 (5.5–8.8) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
Mutant type 6 8.8 (2.0–10.9) 10.97 (2.5–48.26) 5.06 (1.96–13.08) 3.1 (1.1–7.5) 8.66 (1.81–41.4) 5.93 (1.9–18.51)
p value 0.005 < 0.001 0.021 0.002
MET
Non-amp 138 14.9 (12.3–17.5) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 7.3 (5.7–8.8) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
Amp 6 7.0 (5.9–10.5) 5.2 (1.40–19.27) 4.81 (1.53–15.12) 4.7 (0–20.5) 1.55 (0.54–4.51) 1.83(0.57–5.81)
p value 0.033 0.007 0.59 0.3

Non-amp, non-amplification; Amp, amplification.

P value was based on log-rank test for PFS and OS in the univariate analysis (a) and Wald test for PFS and OS in the multivariable Cox regression model adjusting for age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, primary tumor site, number of metastatic sites, and liver involvement (b).