Table 2.

Values of BAT_AIF and BAT_TRF timepoints for the PCa patient data sets. The BAT_TRF values were averaged for the suspected tumor and whole gland ROIs using different BAT estimation methods. The results of BAT_AIF measurements were identical for LL, PL, and PG methods for all the patients. The results of BAT_TRF timepoints include only valid voxels satisfying Eq. (8) conditions with $\tau ={\mathrm{BAT}}_{\mathrm{AIF}}+20\mathrm{ts}$.

Patient	#01	#02	#10	#11	#12	#14	#15	#17	#23
${\mathrm{BAT}}_{\mathrm{AIF}}$ time point
LL,PL, and PG	6	7	6	6	7	6	6	6	6
OQ	6	7	5	5	7	6	6	6	7
Tumor ROI ${\mathrm{BAT}}_{\mathrm{TRF}}$ time points ($\text{mean}\pm \text{standard deviation}$)
LL	N/A	$7.50\pm 0.53$	$6.56\pm 0.55$	$6.00\pm 0.00$	$7.77\pm 0.60$	N/A	N/A	$6.13\pm 0.34$	$7.00\pm 0.00$
PL	$7.05\pm 0.80$	$8.35\pm 0.64$	$7.07\pm 0.34$	$6.74\pm 0.47$	$8.93\pm 0.26$	$6.40\pm 0.50$	$6.23\pm 0.43$	$7.12\pm 0.32$	$7.74\pm 0.44$
OQ	$7.46\pm 0.91$	$8.15\pm 0.44$	$6.77\pm 0.42$	$6.24\pm 0.47$	$8.12\pm 0.77$	$7.04\pm 0.69$	$6.56\pm 0.61$	$6.84\pm 0.37$	$7.17\pm 0.38$
PG	$8.18\pm 1.48$	$8.46\pm 0.52$	$7.01\pm 0.17$	$6.60\pm 0.52$	$8.68\pm 0.54$	$7.25\pm 0.58$	$6.86\pm 0.68$	$6.94\pm 0.24$	$7.79\pm 0.41$
Whole gland ROI ${\mathrm{BAT}}_{\mathrm{TRF}}$ time points ($\text{mean}\pm \text{standard deviation}$)
LL	$7.29\pm 2.24$	$8.30\pm 1.64$	$7.09\pm 0.94$	$6.76\pm 1.01$	$9.53\pm 3.33$	$7.02\pm 2.56$	$7.77\pm 2.56$	$6.99\pm 2.12$	$7.60\pm 1.18$
PL	$7.57\pm 1.50$	$8.71\pm 1.52$	$7.54\pm 0.98$	$6.94\pm 1.13$	$9.25\pm 1.80$	$6.84\pm 1.26$	$7.26\pm 1.32$	$7.40\pm 1.43$	$7.94\pm 1.31$
OQ	$7.60\pm 1.74$	$8.93\pm 1.93$	$7.25\pm 1.04$	$6.96\pm 1.52$	$9.45\pm 2.77$	$7.12\pm 1.19$	$7.50\pm 1.91$	$7.29\pm 1.14$	$8.28\pm 2.22$
PG	$9.32\pm 4.45$	$9.59\pm 2.71$	$7.89\pm 2.10$	$7.69\pm 2.53$	$11.29\pm 4.66$	$7.96\pm 2.70$	$8.48\pm 3.26$	$8.06\pm 3.11$	$9.11\pm 3.60$