Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 2.
Published in final edited form as: J Public Econ. 2013 Nov 1;107:19–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.08.003

Table 4.

Mean Outcomes

No-Friend Group Friend Group

Sample Control A Gift A Control B Gift B Control A Gift A Control B Gift B

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
Panel A. Drug Prescription

Prescription rate for antibiotics 0.50
[0.50]
0.34*
[0.48]
0.49
[0.50]
0.47
[0.50]
0.51
[0.50]
0.34*
[0.48]
0.50
[0.50]
0.43
[0.50]
Total drug expenditure in RMB 80.57
[43.85]
60.19**
[45.24]
80.23
[41.01]
77.62
[38.83]
84.26
[44.91]
65.82*
[45.92]
82.80
[46.03]
71.22
[43.83]
Number of drugs prescribed 2.35
[0.94]
1.81**
[0.75]
2.11
[0.81]
2.10
[0.81]
2.51
[0.94]
1.90**
[0.79]
2.28
[0.87]
2.09
[0.86]

Panel B. Service Quality

Treatment Duration (min) 4.29
[0.96]
4.79**
[0.91]
4.36
[0.85]
3.98**
[0.71]
4.44
[0.86]
5.07**
[0.93]
4.18
[0.79]
4.66**
[0.85]
Physician responds politely after being thanked 0.55
[0.50]
0.73*
[0.45]
0.60
[0.49]
0.45
[0.50]
0.59
[0.50]
0.82**
[0.38]
0.50
[0.50]
0.71**
[0.46]
Quality of the checkup and diagnosis process ( sum of
suvey questions Q10-Q18)
4.06
[2.69]
4.60
[2.29]
4.36
[2.36]
4.04
[2.63]
4.57
[2.59]
5.10
[2.43]
4.05
[2.37]
4.28
[2.06]

Note: an asterisk or double asterisks indicates that the figure in column (2) is significantly different from that of column (1) at either the 5% or 1% significance level. Similar inferences can be drawn for column (4) relative to column (3), column (6) relative to column (5), and column (8) relative to column (7). We use t-tests in this table, and have verified that we get same results using Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests.