Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan-Feb;24(1):37–44. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720150090

Table 2. Mean and standard deviation of the volume of filling material at baseline, after filling removal with rotary instruments, and after re-preparation taking into consideration the presence or absence of an isthmus in the mesial root of mandibular molar.

Baseline (Micro-CT #1)
1-3 mm 3-5 mm 5-7 mm TOTAL
Presence of an isthmus 0.83Aa 1.45Aa 1.91Aa 3.77Aa
(±0.25) (±0.40) (±0.49) (±1.39)
Absence of an isthmus 0.57Ab 1.07Ab 1.51Ab 2.62Ab
(±0.12) (±0.28) (±0.28) (±0.76)

Filling removal with rotary instruments (Micro-CT #2)

1-3 mm 3-5 mm 5-7 mm TOTAL
Presence of an isthmus 0.43Ba 0.57Ba 0.61Ba 1.63Ba
(±0.26) (±0.29) (±0.35) (±0.78)
Absence of an isthmus 0.13Bb 0.13Bb 0.13Bb 0.40Bb
(±0.12) (±0.19) (±0.17) (±0.43)

Re-preparation with ProTaper Next (Micro-CT #3)

1-3 mm 3-5 mm 5-7 mm TOTAL
Presence of an isthmus 0.34Ba 0.52Ba 0.57Ba 1.42Ba
(±0.22) (±0.32) (±0.33) (±0.73)
Absence of an isthmus 0.12Bb 0.10Bb 0.10Bb 0.32Bb
(±0.12) (±0.17) (±0.17) (±0.42)

Different uppercase letters in rows compare the presence or the absence of an isthmus in the same root level after each stage of retreatment using ANOVA and Tukey’s tests (P<0.05). Different lowercase letters in the columns compare the presence and the absence of an isthmus in each root level and stage of retreatment using Student’s t-test (P<0.05)