Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 6;18(11):2055–2066. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014002365

Table 2.

Description of demographic characteristics of children and parents, parental perceptions of food and PA environments and geospatial variables for all children and children categorized as OW/OB and not OW/OB; random sample of households living in low-income, racially diverse communities in four cities in the state of New Jersey, USA, 2009–2010 (New Jersey Childhood Obesity Study)

All children (n 560*) OW/OB (n 223*) Not OW/OB (n 337*) P value for difference between OW/OB v.
%, mean or sd %, mean or sd %, mean or sd not OW/OB
Child demographics
Age (%) 0·005
3–5 years 17·4 28·4 71·6
6–11 years 40·0 50·6 49·4
12–19 years 42·6 36·0 64·0
Gender (%) 0·99
Female 47·7 40·5 59·5
Male 52·3 40·6 59·4
Race/ethnicity (%) 0·80
Non-Hispanic White 4·9 29·9 70·1
Non-Hispanic Black 50·4 42·4 57·6
Hispanic 39·4 39·2 60·8
Other 5·4 42·7 57·3
BMI category (%)
Not OW/OB 59·5
OW/OB 40·5
Parent demographics
Mother’s education (%) 0·16
High school or less 57·1 45·3 54·7
Some college 28·5 34·7 65·3
College plus 14·4 33·3 66·7
Nativity (%) 0·35
Foreign born 31·1 36·6 63·4
US born 68·9 42·3 57·7
Parent BMI (kg/m2) <0·001
Mean 29·7 31·7 28·4
sd 6·59 6·80 6·07
Household characteristics
Household poverty status (%) 0·29
≤200 % FPL 81·1 42·0 58·0
>200 % FPL 18·9 34·0 66·0
SNAP participation (%) 0·08
Yes 28·3 48·1 51·9
No 71·7 37·6 62·4
Other federal programme participation (%) 0·78
Yes 27·9 41·8 58·2
No 72·1 40·0 60·0
Food secure (%) 0·39
Yes 80·2 41·6 58·4
No 19·8 36·0 64·0
Non-English speaking household (%) 0·53
Yes 25·4 38·4 61·6
No 74·6 41·2 58·8
Car for food shopping (%) 0·13
Yes 91·8 39·4 60·6
No 8·2 53·3 46·7
Neighbourhood characteristics
Neighbourhood income (%) 0·06
Lower 32·3 46·1 53·9
Middle 33·9 44·6 55·4
Higher 33·8 31·0 69·0
Neighbourhood race (%) 0·24
Majority Black 52·6 42·3 57·7
Majority White 5·4 50·3 49·7
Majority Hispanic 29·5 40·8 59·2
Mixed 12·5 27·9 72·1
Parental perceptions of neighbourhood
PA opportunities in neighbourhood (%) 0·97
Agree 43·9 40·4 59·6
Disagree 56·1 40·6 59·4
Safety from traffic in neighbourhood (%) 0·32
Unsafe 14·2 34·0 66·0
Safe 85·8 41·6 58·4
Safety from crime in neighbourhood (%) 0·20
Unsafe 22·2 33·6 66·4
Safe 77·8 42·5 57·5
Neighbourhood pleasant for PA (%) 0·70
Unpleasant 15·0 43·2 56·8
Pleasant 85·0 40·0 60·0
Parks to play in neighbourhood (%) 0·93
Yes 79·3 40·7 59·3
No 20·7 40·0 60·0
PA facilities in neighbourhood (%) 0·06
Yes 61·6 55·0 65·9
No 38·4 45·0 34·1
Sidewalk condition (%) 0·70
Good 93·4 40·3 59·7
Poor 6·6 43·8 56·2
Ease of getting to store (%) 0·16
Easy 68·0 38·0 62·0
Difficult 32·0 46·0 54·0
FV available 0·75
Mean no. 7·43 7·41 7·44
sd 0·99 0·95 1·01
FV inexpensive (%) 0·79
Agree 38·4 41·5 58·5
Disagree 61·6 39·9 60·1
LFF available 0·68
Mean no. 7·10 7·07 7·12
sd 1·13 1·16 1·11
LFF inexpensive (%) 0·44
Agree 29·5 43·8 56·2
Disagree 70·5 39·1 60·9
Buy FV at main food store (%) 0·12
At the main store 73·4 38·0 62·0
Somewhere else 26·6 47·5 52·5
Geospatial variables (GIS measures)
Presence of large park in 0·40 km (¼ mile) (%) 0·19
Present 49·7 36·8 63·2
Absent 50·3 44·2 55·8
Presence of PA facility in 0·40 km (¼ mile) (%) 0·83
Present 11·8 39·1 60·9
Absent 88·2 40·7 59·3
Presence of supermarket in 0·40 km (¼ mile) (%) 0·16
Present 9·0 26·8 73·2
Absent 91·0 41·9 58·1
Presence of convenience store in 0·40 km (¼ mile) (%) 0·005
Present 81·2 44·0 56·0
Absent 18·8 25·6 74·4
Presence of limited-service restaurant in 0·40 km (¼ mile) (%) 0·46
Present 68·1 39·0 61·0
Absent 31·9 43·7 56·3
Presence of healthy food outlet in 0·40 km (¼ mile) (%) 0·41
Present 25·6 44·4 55·6
Absent 74·4 39·2 60·8

OW/OB, overweight/obese; FPL, federal poverty level; SNAP, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program; PA, physical activity; FV, fruit and vegetables; LFF, low-fat foods; GIS, geographical information system.

Analysis based on weighed sample and adjusted for complex survey design.

*

Unweighted n.