. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.

Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016 Feb 18;40(3):638–646. doi: 10.1111/acer.12988

Table 2.

Regression Analyses Examining the Main and Interactive Effects of Sex-Related Alcohol Expectancies and Delay Discounting on Frequency of Alcohol-Related Condomless Sex

Variable	B	SE	β	t
Covariate Model
Race	0.07	0.16	.04	0.43
Education	−0.03	0.03	−.08	−0.92
Alcohol Use - Frequency	0.03	0.01	.45	5.28^**
Alcohol Use - Quantity	0.01	0.01	.11	1.28
				Total R² = .24
Sex-Related Alcohol Expectancies – Increased Risk Taking (SRAE-IR)
SRAE-IR	0.06	0.05	.11	1.31
Delay Discounting ^a	0.11	0.09	.10	1.22
SRAE-IR × Delay Discounting	0.05	0.08	.05	0.63
			Δ R² = .02; Total R² = .26
Sex-Related Alcohol Expectancies – Enhanced Sexuality (SRAE-ES)
SRAE-ES	−0.001	0.05	.002	0.03
Delay Discounting	0.10	0.09	.10	1.15
SRAE-ES × Delay Discounting	0.06	0.11	.05	0.59
			Δ R² = .01; Total R² = .25
Sex-Related Alcohol Expectancies – Decreased Nervousness (SRAE-DN)
SRAE-DN	−0.07	0.06	−.11	−1.33
Delay Discounting	0.09	0.09	.09	1.07
SRAE-DN × Delay Discounting	−0.04	0.11	−.03	−0.33
			Δ R² = .02; Total R² = .26

Delay discounting is indexed by the overall k value derived from the Monetary Choice Questionnaire, with higher scores representing steeper discounting of delayed rewards.

p < .05;

^**

p < .01