Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016 Feb 18;40(3):638–646. doi: 10.1111/acer.12988

Table 3.

Regression Analyses Examining the Main and Interactive Effects of Sex-Related Alcohol Expectancies and Delay Discounting on Percentage of Alcohol-Related Condomless Sex

Variable B SE β t
Covariate Model
 Race −6.17 10.70 −.05 −0.58
 Education −1.25 1.80 −.06 −0.70
 Alcohol Use - Frequency 2.10 0.38 .46 5.59**
 Alcohol Use - Quantity 1.10 0.63 .15 1.76
Total R2 = .28
Sex-Related Alcohol Expectancies – Increased Risk Taking (SRAE-IR)
 SRAE-IR 9.41 3.05 .24 3.09**
 Delay Discounting a 12.89 5.61 .18 2.30*
 SRAE-IR × Delay Discounting 10.59 5.16 .15 2.05*
Δ R2 = .09; Total R2 = .37
Sex-Related Alcohol Expectancies – Enhanced Sexuality (SRAE-ES)
 SRAE-ES 5.56 3.40 .13 1.64
 Delay Discounting 11.29 5.64 .16 2.00*
 SRAE-ES × Delay Discounting 13.51 6.90 .15 1.97*
Δ R2 = .06; Total R2 = .34
Sex-Related Alcohol Expectancies – Decreased Nervousness (SRAE-DN)
 SRAE-DN 3.06 3.68 .07 0.83
 Delay Discounting 11.62 5.75 .16 2.02*
 SRAE-DN × Delay Discounting 8.91 7.18 .10 1.24
Δ R2 = .04; Total R2 = .32
a

Delay discounting is indexed by the overall k value derived from the Monetary Choice Questionnaire, with higher scores representing steeper discounting of delayed rewards.

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01