Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci Methods. 2016 Jan 14;262:56–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.01.008

Table 1.

Independence of parameters is dependent upon experimental condition.

Control drp1 opa1 MPP+
Number vs. Size -0.04 -0.22 0.23 -0.04

Interconn. 0.04 0.15 0.26* 0.16

Elongation -0.06 -0.33 0.05 0.12

Area 0.78* 0.66*** 0.73*** 0.74***

Perimeter -0.09 -0.29 0.11 -0.12

Size vs. Interconn. 0.91** 0.51** 0.90*** -0.01

Elongation 0.1 0.92*** 0.39** 0.01

Area 0.52*** 0.22 0.76*** 0.53***

Perimeter 0.93*** 0.98*** 0.89*** 0.90***

Interconn. vs. Elongation 0.13 0.2 0.22 -0.01

Area 0.57** 0.73*** 0.76*** -0.39**

Perimeter 0.73*** 0.33 0.63*** -0.39**

Elongation vs. Area 0.04 0 0.29** 0.14

Perimeter 0.32* 0.97*** 0.53*** -0.04

Area vs. Perimeter 0.44** 0.08 0.53*** 0.39***

Table shows notable comparisons and their respective correlational coefficients between parameters for a given experimental condition (Pearson's r;

*

p < 0.05,

**

p < 0.01,

***

p < 0.001; Control n = 52, drp1 n = 26, opa1 n = 64, MPP+ n = 51).