Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2016 Jan 13;133(9):840–848. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.019985

Table 3.

Relative efficiency of the treat-to-target (TTT), benefit-based tailored treatment (BTT), or hybrid approach (based on current World Health Organization guidelines), utilizing current estimates of utilizing current estimates of blood pressure levels, blood pressure treatment access, other risk factors, and treatment benefit for populations in China and India. Uncertainty intervals are in parentheses.*

Outcome People treated identically
by all three strategies
People treated
most intensively
by TTT
People treated
most intensively
by BTT
People treated
most
intensively by
Hybrid
China
Number of people treated (million n) 2.1 (1.1–3.1) 62.3 (59–65.6) 36.6 (27.8–45.4) 39.4 (36.8–42)
Total DALYs averted (millions) 0.8 (0.5–1.1) 7.4 (7.1–7.7) 12.4 (10.2–14.6) 7.3 (6.9–7.7)
$/DALY among treated 401.4 (222.7–581.7) 438.2 (401.6–475) 271.7 (216.6–328.6) 436.9 (317.9–558.8)
DALYs averted per 1000 patient-years of pharmacotherapy 38.1 (37.7–38.5) 11.9 (10.9–12.9) 33.9 (28.2–39.6) 18.5 (17.8–19.2)
India
Number of people treated (million n) 4.1 (3.2–5) 50.8 (47.8–53.8) 28.8 (13.9–43.7) 21.3 (19.6–23)
Total DALYs averted (millions) 1.4 (1.2–1.6) 5.1 (4.8–5.4) 10 (7.6–12.4) 4.8 (4.6–5)
$/DALY among treated 359.1 (293.2–427) 404.4 (294.5–514.4) 192.9 (165.4–223.5) 359.8 (85.3–637.1)
DALYs averted per 1000 patient-years of pharmacotherapy 34.1 (31.3–36.9) 10.0 (9.1–10.9) 34.7 (30.2–39.2) 22.5 (21.8–23.2)
*

Uncertainty intervals (in parentheses) were determined by 10,000 iterations with multivariable Monte Carlo sampling from normal distributions constructed from the mean and standard deviation of estimated values of all input parameters, including the CVD risk estimation equations. Note: The uncertainty range for results of the BTT strategy are greater than for the TTT strategy because it depends on CVD risk estimation, which can be impacted by errors in measurement of BP, cholesterol, and knowledge of diabetes diagnosis and prior CVD history; by contrast, the TTT treatment decision was only affected by clinical errors in measurement of BP and knowledge of diabetes diagnosis.