Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016 Feb 9;40(3):563–571. doi: 10.1111/acer.12972

Figure 3. Fenofibrate and tesaglitazar did not alter ethanol-induced conditioned place preference in B6 × 129S4 male mice.

Figure 3

Data represent the percent of time spent on the floor with bars paired with administration of 2.0 g/kg ethanol [n=17–18 for saline control; n=10 for fenofibrate (Feno); n=8 for tesaglitazar (Tesa)]. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s test (*p<0.05, **p<0.01 compared to corresponding control).

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure