Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 2;5:258. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-1913-2

Table 2.

Monthly total equivalised household income, expenditure and food consumption (international $, 2011)—weighted analysis

Site Equivalised household income Equivalised household expenditure Equivalised food consumption Income inequality (20:20 ratio)a Consumption inequality (20:20 ratio)b
Peru, urban
n = 140
Mean (95 % CI) 838 (730–946) 321 (293–349) 163 (148–178) 3.48 2.77
Median (IQR) 772 (557–1132) 298 (241–406) 151 (119–200)
Peru, rural
n = 56
Mean (95 % CI) 504 (358–651) 238 (161–314) 121 (93–149) 5.21 4.87
Median (IQR) 392 (294–564) 142 (131–272) 106 (74–144)
Mexico, urban
n = 190
Mean (95 % CI) 427 (368–486) 233 (209–256) 138 (122–154) 5.47 3.54
Median (IQR) 355 (246–487) 199 (150–299) 115 (78–172)
Mexico, rural
n = 167
Mean (95 % CI) 149 (125–173) 165 (131–200) 101 (84–117) 8.91 4.79
Median (IQR) 123 (58–184) 143 (93–203) 92 (52–143)
China, urban
n = 177
Mean (95 % CI) 1456 (1135–1795) 284 (263–304) 182 (166–197) 8.66 3.57
Median (IQR) 914 (694–1265) 260 (193–343) 162 (116–216)
China, rural
n = 147
Mean (95 % CI) 3128 (1828–4427) 237 (189–285) 122 (86–157) 30.17 6.48
Median (IQR) 1540 (611–5127) 218 (123–281) 100 (46–157)

aThe ratio of the aggregate equivalized incomes of the top and bottom 20 % of households by income

bThe ratio of the aggregate equivalized expenditure of the top and bottom 20 % of households by expenditure