Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 2;94(3):568–570. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.94-3intro1

Table 1.

Summary of evaluation designs

Characteristic Burkina Faso Ethiopia Malawi
Evaluation design Quasi-experimental design: purposively selected intervention and randomly selected comparison districts Randomized control trial: “woredas” (districts) randomized in intervention and comparison Dose–response analysis for 28 districts
Research partner(s) Institut Supérieur des Sciences de la Population MELA Research PLC; Alliance for Better Health Services PLC National Statistical Office; Chancellor College, University of Malawi
Intervention area for the evaluation Nine districts (seven malaria and diarrhea only, two iCCM for the three illnesses) 16 woredas National, all 28 districts
Comparison area Seven districts 15 woredas No comparison area
Baseline–Endline 2010–2013 2011–2013 2010–2014
iCCM implementation strength assessment 2013 2012 2013
iCCM quality of care assessment 2012 2012 2009
Mortality measurement Under-five mortality estimated using the Lives Saved Tool (LiST) Under-five and 2–59 months mortality rates measured through full birth history, endline survey Under-five and 2–59 months mortality rates measured through full birth history, endline survey
Additional sub-studies Qualitative study of iCCM utilization8 Qualitative study of iCCM utilization9 Qualitative study of health system supports for iCCM10

iCCM = integrated community case management.