Table S3.
Results of the multivariate model-fitting analyses for brain shape
Model | P | AIC | AICc | ΔAICc | AICc weight |
OU multi + surf | 18 | −594.44 | −571.64 | 0 | 0.94 |
SURFACEc | 16 | −583.29 | −566.29 | 5.35 | 0.06 |
GS | 10 | −548.12 | −542.33 | 29.31 | 0.00 |
OU multi | 16 | −549.41 | −532.41 | 39.23 | 0.00 |
BM | 5 | −530.20 | −528.81 | 42.83 | 0.00 |
EB | 6 | −530.17 | −528.17 | 43.47 | 0.00 |
OU1 | 8 | −525.44 | −521.84 | 49.80 | 0.00 |
Conv | 14 | −523.13 | −510.77 | 60.87 | 0.00 |
Clades | 12 | −467.58 | −458.92 | 112.72 | 0.00 |
For each model, the number of parameters (P), the Akaike information criterion (AIC), the small sample corrected AIC (AICc), and the relative fit (ΔAICc) and support (AICc weight) are shown. The best model has the lowest ΔAICc. See Fig. S4 and Supporting Information for detailed descriptions of OU models.