Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 1;125:89–98. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.01.012

Table 3.

Significant (p < 0.05) univariable over-dispersed Poisson regression analyses for continuous explanatory variables on farm and flock, lambing, health and feeding management associated with incidence rate of clinical mastitis.

Variable N RR Lower CI Upper CI
Percentage of flock with mastitis in previous year kept for breeding in 2009 260 1.62 1.26 2.08
Percentage of flock with poor udder conformation 173 1.13 1.08 1.18
Percentage of flock ‘too fat’ versus ‘about right’ At tupping 293 1.01 1.00 1.01
Mid pregnancy 270 1.01 1.00 1.02
Mid lambing 285 1.01 1.00 1.02
Percentage of flock with singles at scanning 128 0.98 0.97 0.99
The percentage of flock with twins at scanning 129 0.99 0.98 1.01
The percentage of flock with triplets at scanning 127 1.04 1.02 1.06
The percentage of flock with poor udder conformation of the respondents that checked the mammary gland of ewes at lambing 247 1.05 1.01 1.10
The number of lambs reared per ewe 271 0.95 0.74 1.23
Percentage of lambs finished before weaning 294 1.00 1.00 1.01
Percentage of flock with mastitis kept to breed 288 1.62 1.26 2.08
Percentage of flock with poor udder conformation 173 1.13 1.08 1.18
Age of oldest lambs at turnout (days) 233 1.01 1.00 1.01

N = number of respondents who gave a valid response to the question. RR = risk ratio. Lower and upper CI = 96% confidence intervals for the risk ratio.