Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 20;5(3):188–194. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v5n3p188

Table 1.

Comparison of anaemia status before and after intervention among daily IFA supplementation (DIFS) and weekly IFA supplementation (WIFS) groups

Hb (gm%) No. of adolescents Inter group ‘p value’ by matched pair t test of ‘after intervention’ results among both groups: (b) and (d)

Daily IFA Supplementation(n=60) Weekly IFA Supplementation(n=60)

Before intervention(a) After intervention(b) P value Before intervention(c) After intervention(d) p value
>12 (Normal) 00 15(25%) 00 19(31.67%) 0.001
10-11.9 (Mild Anaemia) 37(61.67%) 39(65%) < 0.001 44(73.33%) 37(61.67%) < 0.001
7-9.9 (Moderate Anaemia) 22(36.67%) 06(10%) 16(26.67%) 04(6.66%)
< 7 (Severe Anaemia) 01(1.66%) 00 00 00
Total 60 (100%) 60 (100%) 60 (100%) 60 (100%)