Table 4.
Percentage distribution of new HIV infections by routes of transmission among different subgroups at three time-points, Mumbai, 2000-2017
| Subgroups and source of new HIV infections | Year | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 2010 | 2017 | |
| New infections among IDUs from: | |||
| IDUs (%) | 51 | 73 | 83 |
| Brothel-based FSWs (%) | 44 | 16 | 8 |
| Non-brothel based FSWs (%) | 5 | 11 | 8 |
| New infections among brothel-based FSWs from: | |||
| IDUs (%) | 1 | 6 | 12 |
| Heterosexual clients (%) | 93 | 63 | 47 |
| Bisexual clients (%) | 6 | 31 | 41 |
| New infections among non-brothel-based FSWs from: | |||
| IDUs (%) | 1 | 8 | 14 |
| Heterosexual clients (%) | 94 | 42 | 29 |
| Bisexual clients (%) | 5 | 47 | 57 |
| New infections among heterosexual clients of FSWs from: | |||
| Brothel-based FSWs (%) | 87 | 69 | 60 |
| Non-brothel based FSWs (%) | 12 | 25 | 27 |
| New infections among MSM from: | |||
| MSM (%) | 39 | 63 | 75 |
| Brothel-based FSWs (%) | 54 | 20 | 14 |
| Non-brothel-based FSWs (%) | 6 | 17 | 11 |
| New infections among general women from: | |||
| Heterosexual regular male sexual partners (%) | 79 | 75 | 67 |
| Bisexual regular male sexual partners (%) | 11 | 14 | 19 |
| Casual male sexual partners (%) | 8 | 10 | 11 |
| New infections among general men from: | |||
| Regular female sexual partners (%) | 96 | 98 | 97 |
| Casual female sexual partners (%) | 4 | 2 | 3 |
FSWs: Female sex workers; IDUs: Injecting drug users; MSM: Men who have sex with men/ transgendered people