Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 1;4(2):2–25. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v4n2p2

Table S9. Accommodating age-related cognitive changes

FUNCTION ACCOMMODATION PREFERENCE DESIGN AND PRESENTATION CHOICES
WORKING MEMORY BETTER •  Simple instructions – discrete short messages
•  Label icons; pictorial info should be highly intuitive.
WORSE •  Information overload
PROSPECTIVE MEMORY BETTER •  Provide event-based reminders (e.g. voice mail reminders; buzzer sounds – but with caution, see below).
WORSE •  Time-based instructions (e.g. take pill every four to six hours)
•  Too many similarly-beeping gadgets

PROCEDURAL MEMORY BETTER •  Simple intuitive steps. Place in context.
•  Minimize the number of steps.
•  Slow the pace of training. Frequent repetition for reinforcement. Practice opportunities.
•  Give feedback cues for correct action (a key “clicks” or “beeps” when depressed.)
WORSE •  Complex, multi-step process.
•  Procedures inconsistent with established practice.

ATTENTION BETTER •  Simple displays. Short, discrete signals.
WORSE •  Avoid visual clutter or background noise.
•  Avoid arrays of functions and displays.
•  Avoid concurrent actions (pressing three keyboard keys to execute command.)

MESSAGE COMPREHENSION BETTER •  Clear messages
•  Reasonable pace
•  Predictable linguistic structure
•  Pauses at grammatical boundaries (after phrases, end of sentences)
•  Redundant information
•  Rich in context
WORSE •  Having to process several pieces of information to draw a conclusion (e.g. typical automated telephone prompts)
•  Presenting irrelevant information
•  Subtlety, irony, ambiguity
•  Unfamiliar context