Table 2.
The effect of TU‐100 ingestion on the composition of fecal bacterial genera
| Name | Phylum | Family | Population (% of total sequences) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIN76A diet | 1.5% TU‐100 diet | ||||
| Clostridium sp. | Firmicutes | Clostridiaceae | 19.118 ± 3.982 | 27.219 ± 4.512 | 0.0437 |
| Clostridium clostridioforme | Firmicutes | Clostridiaceae | 0.017 ± 0.019 | 0.104 ± 0.058 | 0.0323 |
| Clostridium populeti | Firmicutes | Clostridiaceae | 0.140 ± 0.011 | 0.525 ± 0.197 | 0.0031 |
| Clostridium sulfidigenes | Firmicutes | Clostridiaceae | 0.033 ± 0.037 | 0.159 ± 0.121 | 0.0417 |
| Clostridium thermocellum | Firmicutes | Clostridiaceae | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.025 ± 0.021 | 0.0454 |
| Clostridium asparagiforme | Firmicutes | Clostridiaceae | 0.041 ± 0.038 | 0.146 ± 0.068 | 0.0228 |
| Bryantella formatexigens | Firmicutes | Clostridiaceae | 0.976 ± 0.290 | 0.374 ± 0.266 | 0.0427 |
| Clostridium propionicum | Firmicutes | Clostridiaceae | 0.004 ± 0.007 | 0.028 ± 0.014 | 0.0254 |
| Lactococcus sp. | Firmicutes | Streptococcaceae | 1.176 ± 0.137 | 4.770 ± 2.602 | 0.0308 |
| Lactococcus lactis | Firmicutes | Streptococcaceae | 0.387 ± 0.116 | 1.153 ± 0.612 | 0.0195 |
| Peptococcus sp. | Firmicutes | Peptococcaceae | 0.017 ± 0.019 | 0.084 ± 0.041 | 0.0260 |
| Staphylococcus sp. | Firmicutes | Staphylococcaceae | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.084 ± 0.007 | 0.0024 |
| Roseburia intestinalis | Firmicutes | Lachnospiraceae | 0.358 ± 0.251 | 1.616 ± 0.861 | 0.0201 |
| Eubacterium hallii | Firmicutes | Eubacteriaceae | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.022 ± 0.020 | 0.0489 |
| Alistipes sp. | Bacteroidetes | Rikenellaceae | 0.120 ± 0.074 | 0.684 ± 0.288 | 0.0039 |
| Alistipes shahii | Bacteroidetes | Rikenellaceae | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.044 ± 0.020 | 0.0122 |
| Anaerophaga sp. | Bacteroidetes | Rikenellaceae | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.039 ± 0.035 | 0.0292 |
Data represent means ± SD (n = 5–6). Statistical analysis was performed by unpaired Student's t test.