Table 1. The quality score and the number of counts of ginjo sake by 15 sensory evaluation panelists.
| Sample name | Flavor quality (a) | Taste quality (a) | Ethyl caproate | Hineka odor | Raw-hineka odor | Yeast debris-like odor | Sulfur-like odor | Fatty acid odor | Pleasant bitter taste | Pleasant astringent taste | Inharmonious bitter taste | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | 30 | 34 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 21 |
| A3 | 40 | 38 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 21 |
| A4 | 35 | 36 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | This study |
| A5 | 37 | 34 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | This study |
| A9 | 40 | 41 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 21 |
| A10 | 34 | 33 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 21 |
| A11 | 31 | 31 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 21 |
| B4 | 43 | 46 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 21 |
| B5 | 56 | 49 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 21 |
| B6 | 71 | 63 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 21 |
| C2 | 63 | 57 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 21 |
| C3 | 73 | 63 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 |
| C5 | 52 | 47 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 21 |
(a) Low score means high quality