Table 2.
The effects of experimental factors on ROI-averaged neural responses.
| ROI | V1 | hMT+ | V6 | PcM | CSv | PIVC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main effect | ||||||
| Motion pattern | 0.001∗∗ | 0.000∗∗∗ | 0.000∗∗∗ | 0.000∗∗∗ | 0.001∗∗ | 0.004∗∗ |
| (R > C) | (C > S, R > S) | (C > R, C > S) | (C > R, C > S) | (C > S > R) | (C > R, C > S) | |
| Stimulus size | 0.000∗∗∗ | 0.702 | 0.000∗∗∗ | 0.003∗∗ | 0.040∗ | 0.021∗ |
| Stereo | 0.150 | 0.465 | 0.223 | 0.688 | 0.255 | 0.831 |
| Interaction | ||||||
| Motion pattern × stimulus size | 0.861 | 0.953 | 0.001∗∗∗ | 0.042∗ | 0.081+ | 0.112 |
| Motion pattern × stereo | 0.025∗ | 0.030∗ | 0.951 | 0.640 | 0.635 | 0.856 |
| Stimulus size × stereo | 0.449 | 0.670 | 0.253 | 0.826 | 0.689 | 0.893 |
| All three factors | 0.257 | 0.998 | 0.668 | 0.224 | 0.429 | 0.199 |
We used a three-way repeated-measures ANOVA to examine the main effects and interactions between Motion Pattern, Stimulus Size, and Stereo Factor with respect to ROI-averaged neural responses. For the main effect of Motion Pattern, we performed post hoc paired t-tests with Bonferroni–Holm adjustment to further assess the pairwise differences between conditions. Statistical significance is expressed in terms of p-values. S: static; R: random motion; C: coherent motion. +p < 0.1, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001.