Table 2. Odds of reporting consumption of pre-packaged sugar-sweetened beverages in the past week: random-digit dialled telephone sample of US adults (n 592), April 2009–June 2010.
| Consumption | 95% CI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
||||
| Total n | % Yes | OR | Lower | Upper | |
| Overall | 69.4 | ||||
| Gender | |||||
| Male | 277 | 75.1 | 1.0 | Referent | |
| Female | 315 | 64.1 | 0.7 | 0.46 | 106 |
| Age (years) | |||||
| 18–24 | 70 | 91.4 | 1.0* | Referent | |
| 25–44 | 239 | 75.5 | 0.4 | 0.13 | 0.93 |
| 45–64 | 183 | 65.4 | 0.2 | 0.09 | 0.66 |
| 65+ | 100 | 47.5 | 0.1 | 0.05 | 0.37 |
| BMI | |||||
| Healthy weight or underweight | 225 | 63.8 | 1.0 | Referent | |
| Overweight | 181 | 68.9 | 1.1 | 0.71 | 1.86 |
| Obese | 161 | 78.9 | 2.1* | 1.23 | 3.60 |
| Race | |||||
| White | 438 | 66.7 | 1.0 | Referent | |
| Black | 62 | 87.1 | 2.9* | 1.20 | 7.11 |
| Hispanic | 38 | 76.3 | 1.2 | 0.50 | 2.81 |
| Other | 41 | 74.4 | 1.5 | 0.69 | 3.49 |
| Education | |||||
| Less than 12 years | 48 | 78.7 | 1.0 | Referent | |
| High-school graduate or GED | 153 | 78.9 | 0.8 | 0.29 | 2.04 |
| Some college | 170 | 66.7 | 0.3* | 0.13 | 0.89 |
| College graduate or more | 218 | 61.9 | 0.3* | 0.12 | 0.84 |
| Income | |||||
| <$US 17500 | 70 | 73.5 | 1.0 | Referent | |
| $US 17501–40000 | 111 | 67.6 | 0.8 | 0.39 | 1.85 |
| $US 40001–65000 | 113 | 69.9 | 1.6 | 0.70 | 3.46 |
| >$US 65000 | 217 | 70.5 | 1.5 | 0.70 | 3.35 |
| Refused | 63 | 57.1 | 1.0 | 0.40 | 2.61 |
| Phone | |||||
| Landline | 387 | 62.2 | 1.0 | Referent | |
| Cell phone | 206 | 82.8 | 1.6 | 0.95 | 2.53 |
GED, General Educational Development.
*
OR and 95% CI were significant in a logistic regression model controlling for each variable presented in the table: P<0.05.