Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Rev. 2015 Dec 1;38:241–268. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2015.09.001

Table 2.

Summary of inverse-variance-weighted multiple regression analyses.

Conditions Predictor   B   SE   95% CI   z   p   β ES (odds ratio)a
Standard Year of publication   0.01   0.01 [−0.02, 0.04]   0.89   .37   .07
Task modality −0.03   0.13 [−.029, 0.23] −0.23   .82 −.01
Pass criterion −0.61   2.05 [−4.63, 3.41] −0.30   .77 −.02
Age   0.10   0.08   [0.08, 0.11] 12.26 <.001   .74 3.21
Labeling procedure   0.38   0.07   [0.24, 0.51]   5.50 <.001   .32 Relevant vs. both dim. labeled = 2.13
Conflict emphasis   0.19   0.09   [0.03, 0.36]   2.29   .02   .15 Conflict emphasis vs. standard = 1.47
n pre-switch trials −0.16   0.07 [−0.29, −0.02] −2.22   .03 −.15 5 vs. 6 trials = 1.17
Pre-switch feedback −0.07   0.07 [−0.20, 0.06] −1.02   .31 −.07
Pre-test practice −0.18   0.11 [−0.40, 0.05] −1.56   .19 −.11
Standard + salience Age   0.07   0.01   [0.06, 0.08] 11.73 <.001   .57
Relative post-switch salience   0.59   0.14   [0.32, 0.86]   4.24 <.001   .21 1.80
Standard + separated Age   0.08   0.01   [0.06, 0.07] 12.52 <.001   .64
Degree of spatial separation   0.46   0.12   [0.15, 0.58]   3.85 <.001   .29 1.59
Standard + alternateb Age   0.07   0.01   [0.05, 0.07] 12.02 <.001   .55
Modality −0.14   0.07 [−0.28, 0.01] −2.02   .05 −.10 1.33
Reversal shift – bidimensional −0.49   0.26 [−1.01, 0.03] −1.86   .06 −.10 0.61
Observation   0.11   0.15 [−0.19, 0.41]   0.75   .46   .04
Redundant/goal neglect −0.44   0.23 [−0.88, 0.01] −1.96   .05 −.11 0.64
Child label   0.47   0.26 [−0.03, 0.97]   1.83   .07   .10 1.60
Child label (+labeling procedure)   0.41   0.24 [−0.06, 0.87]   4.51   .09   .24
Reversal shift – unidimensional   1.46   0.24   [0.99, 1.93]   6.06 <.001   .31 4.31
Target character   1.73   0.24   [1.26, 2.20]   7.24 <.001   .37 5.66

CI = confidence interval.

Bs for all control variables are reported for the first analysis and in subsequent analyses only if significant.

a

Effect sizes reflect increased odds of switching compared to standard condition given an increase of one level of the independent variable unless otherwise specified.

b

Bs for significant control predictors correspond to omnibus analysis; Bs for each version correspond to separate regression analyses. Effect sizes are only reported for predictors significant at p < .05.