Table 2.
Response | Comparison | Estimate | SE | t | p | Adjusted p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arousal frequency | pre-WNS vs peak-WNS | −0.10 | 0.02 | −5.27 | <.0001 | <.0001 |
post-WNS vs peak-WNS | −0.09 | 0.02 | −4.24 | 0.0001 | 0.0003 | |
post-WNS vs pre-WNS | 0.02 | 0.01 | 1.42 | 0.16 | 0.1773 | |
Arousal duration | pre-WNS vs peak-WNS | −0.23 | 0.11 | −2.21 | 0.034 | 0.0445 |
post-WNS vs peak-WNS | 0.30 | 0.09 | 3.17 | 0.003 | 0.0055 | |
post-WNS vs pre-WNS | 0.54 | 0.10 | 5.14 | <.0001 | <.0001 | |
Arousal temperature Tsk | pre-WNS vs peak-WNS | −2.00 | 0.90 | −2.22 | 0.0325 | 0.0445 |
post-WNS vs peak-WNS | −1.25 | 0.84 | −1.50 | 0.1428 | 0.1714 | |
post-WNS vs pre-WNS | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.87 | 0.3900 | 0.3900 | |
Torpor temperature Tsk | pre-WNS vs peak-WNS | −2.05 | 0.36 | −5.68 | <.0001 | <.0001 |
post-WNS vs peak-WNS | −4.00 | 0.36 | −11.26 | <.0001 | <.0001 | |
post-WNS vs pre-WNS | −1.95 | 0.33 | −5.87 | <.0001 | <.0001 |
Arousal frequency was tested in a GLS model, accounting for differences in residual variance between groups. Arousal duration was tested in a mixed GLM model, accounting for differences in residual variance among individuals in different groups. The multiple comparison p-values were FDR-adjusted across the table