Table 3. Summary of peer-reviewed literature presenting findings from self-reported surveys of multiunit housing decision makers.

Lead author	Year	Study location	Respondent type	Housing type	Sample size	Response rate	Survey method	Participant incentive
Cramer	2011	Douglas County, Nebraska	Property owner or management company	Not specified	118 respondents; representing 24 080 units on 974 different properties	30.1 % (combined telephone and mail)	Telephone and mail	None
Jackson	2011	Alexandria, Richmond, Roanoke, and Norfolk, Virginia	Property managers	Apartments (market-rate and public housing), townhouses and senior centres	263 respondents	51 % overall, 48% for Alexandria, 70% for Roanoke, 46% for Richmond, 47% for Norfolk	Telephone	None
Hewett	2007	Minnesota	Key decision makers in the management of rental properties (owners, employees, property management companies)	Apartments	49 decision makers; managed 889 buildings and 27 116 rental units	Not reported	Telephone	$100
King	2010	Western New York	Owners and managers	Market-rate and public housing	127 respondents	62%	Telephone and paper	$50
King	2011	New York	Owners and managers	Market-rate and public housing	154 respondents completed both surveys	54% for follow-up survey	Telephone and paper	$50 per survey
Pizacani	2011	Portland, Oregon	Managers	Subsidised housing	11	Not reported	In-person, semistructured interview 6 weeks after policy implementation and online questionnaires seven times throughout the study period	None