Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Diabet Med. 2015 Oct 8;33(7):912–919. doi: 10.1111/dme.12958

Table 3. Associations of MetS, components and number of components of the MetS with the severity of TAC among participants with prevalent TAC.

N (%) Model 1* Model 2 Model 3
Exp(β) (95% CI) Exp(β) (95% CI) Exp(β) (95% CI)
MetS and diabetes
Neither condition 999 (61) 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref)
MetS 576 (26) 1.24 (1.03, 1.48) 1.22 (1.03, 1.44) 1.23 (1.03, 1.45)
Diabetes without MetS 68 (4) 1.25 (0.79, 1.86) 1.44 (0.93, 2.12) 1.43 (0.93, 2.10)
Diabetes with MetS 254 (13) 1.26 (0.98, 1.59) 1.42 (1.12, 1.77) 1.39 (1.09, 1.74)
Components of the MetS
Elevated BP 1468 (77) 1.69 (1.40, 2.04) 1.46 (1.22,.1.75) 1.46 (1.22, 1.75)
Low HDL 717 (38) 1.01 (0.86, 1.19) 1.07 (0.92, 1.26) 1.07 (0.90, 1.26)
High TG 607 (32) 0.98 (0.85, 1.16) 1.02 (0.86, 1.20) 0.92 (0.77, 1.09)
Impaired fasting glucose (≥100 mg/dl) 638 (34) 1.21 (1.02, 1.43) 1.28 (1.09, 1.50) 1.21 (1.03, 1.43)
Abdominal obesity 1097 (58) 1.07 (0.91, 1.27) 1.07 (0.91, 1.27) 1.01 (0.85, 1.19)
Number of components of the MetS
 0 118 (6) 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref)
 1 406 (21) 1.38 (0.96, 1.98) 1.29 (0.92, 1.81) 1.23 (0.88, 1.72)
 2 543 (29) 1.32 (0.93, 1.88) 1.28 (0.91, 1.78) 1.22 (0.88, 1.69)
 3 415 (22) 1.51 (1.05, 2.17) 1.48 (1.05, 2.08) 1.43 (1.02, 2.01)
 4 301 (16) 1.63 (1.12, 2.38) 1.60 (1.12, 2.27) 1.52 (1.06, 2.16)
 5 114 (6) 1.82 (1.15, 2.86) 1.74 (1.13, 2.67) 1.64 (1.06, 2.53)
*

Unadjusted.

Adjusted for age, gender and ethnicity.

Adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, LDL, smoking and lipid-lowering medications.

Exp(β), relative difference in geometric mean TAC score compared to the reference group.