Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 5;16:228. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2900-9

Table 4.

Linear regression between job strain and resting heart rate

Job strain (95 % CI) p-value Job demands (95 % CI) p-value Job control (95 % CI) p-value
Model 1 1.26 (0.14;2.38) 0.03 −0.15 (−0.37;0.06) 0.17 −0.26 (−0.42;−0.10) 0.001
Model 2 1.09 (−0.02;2.21) 0.05 −0.13 (−0.35;0.08) 0.22 −0.21 (−0.36;−0.05) 0.01
Model 3 0.83 (−0.27;1.94) 0.14 −0.17 (−0.38;0.04) 0.12 −0.19 (−0.34;−0.03) 0.02
Model 4 0.75 (−0.35;1.86) 0.18 −0.17 (−0.38;0.03) 0.10 −0.18 (−0.33;−0.02) 0.02
Model 5 0.59 (−0.52;1.70) 0.30 −0.14 (−0.35;0.07) 0.19 −0.14 (−0.30;0.01) 0.08
Model 6 0.37 (−0.72;1.46) 0.51 −0.16 (−0.36;0.05) 0.14 −0.10 (−0.26;0.05) 0.18

Significant results are in bold. Intercepts are not presented

Model 1: Unadjusted

Model 2: Adjustments were made for gender and age

Model 3: As model 2 but further adjustments were made for BMI

Model 4: As model 3 but further adjustments were made for smoking

Model 5: As model 4 but further adjustments were made for education

Model 6: As model 5 but further adjustments were made for leisure time physical activity