Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 1;26(1):10–18. doi: 10.1089/cap.2015.0098

Table 1.

Fit Indices Comparing Increasing Degrees of Measurement Invariance for the C-SHARP

Fit index Configural Weak Strong Strict V1 Strict V2
Chi-square 4279.1 4332.1 4451.3 4391.7 4400.3
df 2134 2180 2223 2271 2286
 Chi-square/df 2.005 1.987 2.002 1.934 1.925
p <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Scaled difference   47.2 167.3 54.5 19.4
df   46 43 48 15
p   0.422 <.001 0.240 0.196
CFI 0.797 0.796 0.789 0.799 0.800
ΔCFI   −0.001 −0.007 0.010 0.001
McNCI 0.189 0.188 0.177 0.192 0.193
ΔMcNCI   −0.001 −0.011 0.015 0.001
AIC 65992 65900 65814 65718 65688
RMSEA 0.056 0.055 0.056 0.054 0.054
SRMR 0.083 0.089 0.090 0.091 0.113

Models are additive and were tested sequentially, left to right. Constraints for equality across groups placed on each model are as followed: Configural, structure; weak, loadings; strong, intercepts; strict V1, residuals; strict V2, latent variance/covariance. Low values are better for the RMSEA (good: <0.05) and the SRMR (good: <0.08). The AIC is a comparative measure of fit with no intrinsic meaning; lower values indicate better fit. CFI and McNCI are measures of absolute and relative fit; measurement invariance is rejected when ΔCFI <−0.005 or when ΔMcNCI <−0.010. The statistic associated with the preferred model for each index is bolded. Ultimately, the strict V2 model was judged superior and was used as the final model.

C-SHARP, Children's Scale for Hostility and Aggression: Reactive/Proactive; CFI, comparative fit index; McNCI, McDonald's non-centrality index, AIC, Akaike information criterion, RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation, SRMR, standardized root mean residual.