Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 1;33(5):425–438. doi: 10.1089/neu.2014.3812

Table 3.

Approaches Used in Acute/Subacute Spinal Cord Injury

Study Study phase Approach Classification Mechanism Outcome measure/effect (clinical neurological and/or motor performance) Comparison/control Direction of results Follow-up CS integrity CS connectivity
Fehlings et al, 2011 Phase I Cethrin Pharmacology ↓ excitoxicity AIS scores N/A N/A 12 months MRI Absent
Chen et al, 2005 Phase I Raffinee Pharmacology ↓ excitoxicity AIS scores N/A N/A 2–3 weeks Absent Absent
Shapiro et al, 2005 Phase I Implanted oscillating electric field Electrical stimulation/neuroelectric device Neural guidance AIS scores N/A N/A 6 months, 12 months MRI-excluded complete injuries Absent
Park et al, 2005 Phase I Bone-marrow derived mesenchymal stromal cells Cell therapy Neural regeneration AIS scores N/A N/A 6–18 months MRI-excluded complete injuries Absent
Zhou et al, 2012 Phase I Autologous activated Schwann cells Cell therapy Neural regeneration AIS scores, FIM N/A N/A 15–18 weeks, 5–8 years MRI MEPs (post-test)
Knoller et al, 2005 Phase I Autologous macrophages Cell therapy Neural regeneration AIS scores N/A N/A 4–12 months MRI MEPs
Grossman et al, 2014 Phase II Riluzole Pharmacology ↓ excitoxicity AIS motor scores,* SCIM Database control * = ↑ Riluzole 42 days, 3 months, 6 months* Absent Absent
Takahashi et al, 2012 Phase II G-CSF Pharmacology ↓ excitoxicity AIS motor scores Database control  = ↑ (G-CSF) 3 months Absent Absent
Casha et al, 2012 Phase III Minocycline Pharmacology ↓ excitoxicity AIS scores, FIM, and SCIM Placebo No differences 3, 6, and 12 months Absent Absent
Inada et al, 2014 Phase II G-CSF Pharmacology ↓ excitoxicity AIS motor scores* Control (no intervention) * = ↑ (G-CSF) 1 year Absent Absent
Kumru et al, 2013 Phase III High-frequency rTMS Combination of electrical stimulation/neuroelectric device + rehabilitation Plasticity Gait speed and LEMS (AIS) Sham-rTMS + rehabilitation  = ↑ rTMS + rehabilitation 5 weeks Absent MEPs
Alcobendas-Maestro et al, 2012 Phase III Locomotor training (overground vs. robotic orthosis) Rehabilitation Plasticity FIM, WISCI, walking distance and LEMS (AIS), walking speed Overground locomotor training  = ↑ robotic orthosis 8 weeks Absent Absent
Dobkin et al, 2007 Phase III Locomotor training (overground vs. treadmill) + Physical therapy, nursing Combination of rehabilitation+ nursing Plasticity Walking speed Overground locomotor training No differences 9 weeks Absent Absent
Wong et al, 2013 Phase III Electrical and auricular acupuncture + rehabilitation Combination of rehabilitation techniques Unknown AIS scores, Ffunctional Independence Measure Rehabilitation in isolation  = ↑rehab + acupuncture 12 months Absent Absent
Li et al, 2012 Phase III DHYZ Pharmacology Unknown AIS scores* Placebo * = ↑ DHYZ group 12 weeks Absent Absent
Maric et al, 2009 Phase III L-Dopa Pharmacology Plasticity AIS scores, FIM, WISCI Placebo No differences 12 weeks Absent Absent
*

Refers to between-group differences and †refers to pre-post differences.

Phase I studies do not include a control/comparison group and do not assess effectiveness (direction of results); therefore, these items have been noted as applicable (N/A).

AIS, American Spinal Cord Injury Impairment Scale; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MEP, motor evoked potentials; SCIM, Spinal Cord Independence Measure; G-CSF, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; FIM, Functional Independence Measure; rTMS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; LEMS, lower extremity motor scores obtained from AIS assessment; WISCI, walking index for spinal cord injury; DHYZ, Di Huang Yin Zi, a traditional Chinese medicine.