Table 1.
Relationship between METH use and HIV outcomes
Indicator | Study, Year, Country |
Population | Sample Size |
Study Design | Study Purpose | Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ART adherence | Parsons et al. (2013) USA | HIV-positive gay and bisexual men ART regimen | 210 | RCT – baseline data | To examine aggregate, threshold, and day-level associations of METH use and non-adherence. | There was a significant association between days of meth use and 90% dose adherence, such that for every additional day of meth use, the odds of being less than 90% adherent increased by 20%. |
Carrico et al. (2010) USA | MSM or transgendered people on ART | 122 | Cross-sectional | To examine affective correlates of stimulant use and ART adherence among HIV-positive methamphetamine users. | Elevated negative effect was independently associated with a greater likelihood of reporting METH use at least weekly. | |
Hinkin et al. (2007) USA | HIV-positive individuals receiving highly active ART | 150 | Prospective cohort study | To examine the impact of drug use and abuse on medication adherence | Results of logistic regression revealed that drug use was associated with a 4.1 times greater risk of being a poor adherance. 70% of drug users in this study used METH | |
Viral Load | Fairbairn et al. (2011) Canada | HIV-positive, injection drug users initiating ART | 384 | Prospective RCT | To demonstrate the association (if any) between crystal METH use and HIV RNA suppression. | Crystal methamphetamine injection was negatively associated with viral load suppression (RH, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40–0.98). |
King et al. (2009) USA | MSM and/or drug users | 835 | Cross-sectional | To examine the predisposing, enabling, and need factors associated with detectable viral load (VL). | Participants reporting drug use in the past 30 days, were significantly more likely to have detectable viral loads. The association of recent reported METH use with viral load is about 45% stronger than recent use of other drugs. | |
Ellis et al. (2003) USA | HIV-positive METH users and nonusers | 230 | Cross-sectional – lab measures | To determine whether meth increases HIV replication in humans | METH-use was significantly related to plasma virus load among the subgroup receiving ART. | |
Carrico et al. (2007) USA | HIV-positive individuals | 936 | Randomized behavioral prevention trial | To examine the association among affect regulation, substance use, non-adherence to ART, and immune status. | Among individuals currently on ART, regular stimulant users had a five-fold higher HIV viral load than those who denied regular stimulant use. | |
CD4+ Count | Shoptaw et al. (2012) USA | Gay and bisexual men | 2789 | Prospective Cohort – Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study | To examine associations between stimulant use and other substances with immune function biomarkers among HIV+ | Significant negative associations were noted for HIV+ ART-using men between CD4+/CD8+ ratios and METH use. |