Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2015 Apr 8;10(3):477–486. doi: 10.1007/s11481-015-9604-2

Table 1.

Relationship between METH use and HIV outcomes

Indicator Study,
Year,
Country
Population Sample
Size
Study Design Study Purpose Findings
ART adherence Parsons et al. (2013) USA HIV-positive gay and bisexual men ART regimen 210 RCT – baseline data To examine aggregate, threshold, and day-level associations of METH use and non-adherence. There was a significant association between days of meth use and 90% dose adherence, such that for every additional day of meth use, the odds of being less than 90% adherent increased by 20%.
Carrico et al. (2010) USA MSM or transgendered people on ART 122 Cross-sectional To examine affective correlates of stimulant use and ART adherence among HIV-positive methamphetamine users. Elevated negative effect was independently associated with a greater likelihood of reporting METH use at least weekly.
Hinkin et al. (2007) USA HIV-positive individuals receiving highly active ART 150 Prospective cohort study To examine the impact of drug use and abuse on medication adherence Results of logistic regression revealed that drug use was associated with a 4.1 times greater risk of being a poor adherance. 70% of drug users in this study used METH
Viral Load Fairbairn et al. (2011) Canada HIV-positive, injection drug users initiating ART 384 Prospective RCT To demonstrate the association (if any) between crystal METH use and HIV RNA suppression. Crystal methamphetamine injection was negatively associated with viral load suppression (RH, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40–0.98).
King et al. (2009) USA MSM and/or drug users 835 Cross-sectional To examine the predisposing, enabling, and need factors associated with detectable viral load (VL). Participants reporting drug use in the past 30 days, were significantly more likely to have detectable viral loads. The association of recent reported METH use with viral load is about 45% stronger than recent use of other drugs.
Ellis et al. (2003) USA HIV-positive METH users and nonusers 230 Cross-sectional – lab measures To determine whether meth increases HIV replication in humans METH-use was significantly related to plasma virus load among the subgroup receiving ART.
Carrico et al. (2007) USA HIV-positive individuals 936 Randomized behavioral prevention trial To examine the association among affect regulation, substance use, non-adherence to ART, and immune status. Among individuals currently on ART, regular stimulant users had a five-fold higher HIV viral load than those who denied regular stimulant use.
CD4+ Count Shoptaw et al. (2012) USA Gay and bisexual men 2789 Prospective Cohort – Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study To examine associations between stimulant use and other substances with immune function biomarkers among HIV+ Significant negative associations were noted for HIV+ ART-using men between CD4+/CD8+ ratios and METH use.