Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Health Econ. 2016 Jan 29;46:70–89. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.01.005

Table A14.

Policy effects on conditional expenditures (Cross-sectional sample)

Conditional expenditures
Alcohol Tobacco Sweets Soft drinks
CCT −82.931* −6.371 −18.594*** −34.878***
(49.743) (8.518) (4.966) (7.723)
CCT × Post 57.202 0.922 10.171* −26.987***
(58.622) (10.529) (5.552) (8.732)
log(Expenditures) −275.775* −48.564* −273.963*** −408.032***
(153.082) (28.972) (22.807) (38.231)
log(Expenditures)2 21.987** 4.147** 19.819*** 29.469***
(9.234) (1.733) (1.347) (2.238)
Household size −6.753 1.123 −4.641*** 1.2
(8.294) (1.148) (0.895) (1.342)
% of adults in HH 14.918 39.321*** −56.440*** −20.060*
(68.677) (11.038) (7.689) (11.372)
Head is male 42.526 26.063*** 16.891*** 13.904*
(49.968) (9.121) (5.666) (8.139)
Education, ref = none
 Some primary −43.307 4.393 2.169 −0.431
(44.388) (8.390) (5.279) (8.227)
 Some secondary −16.126 12.971 1.174 1.836
(50.821) (9.208) (5.884) (9.083)
 Some tertiary −10.344 42.339*** 9.972 −27.943**
(65.476) (12.448) (7.508) (11.527)
Language, ref = Spanish
 Quechua −79.348** −1.754 −7.807** −18.847***
(33.175) (5.784) (3.695) (5.408)
 Other −86.202* −1.094 −21.003*** −20.974***
(49.035) (7.495) (5.807) (7.984)
Marital status, ref = married
 Widowed, divorced, or separated −6.007 11.204 11.762** −7.435
(39.975) (7.170) (5.483) (7.539)
 Single 20.374 18.832* 19.398** −6.732
(63.013) (11.249) (8.037) (11.091)
Respondent is male 23.659 −7.618 5.803* 20.070***
(28.433) (4.839) (3.522) (5.060)
District poverty −133.386 −9.404 −87.095** −192.265***
(353.176) (53.374) (35.765) (54.753)
Constant 1014.587 84.319 1080.832*** 1524.200***
(652.505) (122.629) (97.606) (165.305)

Year fixed effects Yes Yes Yes Yes
Region fixed effects Yes Yes Yes Yes
Community type fixed effects Yes Yes Yes Yes
Number of obs. 1,413 2,418 15,823 11,909
Number of districts 412 427 711 706
Mean of dependent variable 228.222 73.336 131.159 225.923

Note: This table displays the impact of the policy change on conditional expenditures for the cross-sectional sample. Robust standard errors, clustered at the district level, are shown in parentheses.

Significance:

***

p < 0.01

**

p < 0.05

*

p < 0.10.