Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 1;6(1):10–19. doi: 10.1089/jcr.2015.0024

Table 1.

Demographic Profile of Study Sample

Demographic characteristic Less than weekly energy drink use (n = 571) Weekly energy drink use (n = 303) Total sample (n = 874)
Mean years of age (SD)a 23.7 (2.7) 24.1 (2.6) 23.9 (2.7)
Sex (% female)b 68 51 62
Ethnicity (% non-Hispanic) 92 92 92
Race (%)
 White or Caucasian 79 83 80
 Black or African American 6 4 5
 Asian 7 7 7
 Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander <1 0 <1
 American Indian or Alaska Native <1 1 <1
 Other 2 <1 1
 More than one race 5 6 5
Annual household income (%)
 Under $25,000 31 29 30
 $25,000–$34,999 18 17 18
 $35,000–$49,999 17 19 18
 $50,000–$74,999 16 20 17
 $75,000–$99,999 9 7 8
 $100,000–$124,999 5 6 5
 $125,000–$150,000 2 1 2
 Over $150,000 3 1 2
Highest level of education (%)
 No high school diploma 1 1 1
 High school diploma or equivalent 9 8 9
 Some college, no degree 34 40 36
 Trade, technical, vocational training 2 2 2
 Associate's degree 8 11 9
 Bachelor's degree 35 32 34
 Master's degree 8 7 8
 Professional/doctorate degree 2 <1 1
Employment status (%)
 Employed full-timeb 33 50 39
 Employed part-time 15 17 16
 Studentc 32 21 28
 Unemployedb 20 11 17
Marital status (%)
 Married 19 19 19
 Widowed 0 0 0
 Divorcedb 1 5 3
 Never married 80 75 78
a

p ≤ 0.05 represent significant group differences between weekly energy drink users and less-than-weekly energy drink users based on results of t-tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables.

b

p ≤ 0.001 represent significant group differences between weekly energy drink users and less-than-weekly energy drink users based on results of t-tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables.

c

p ≤ 0.01 represent significant group differences between weekly energy drink users and less-than-weekly energy drink users based on results of t-tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables.