Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov-Dec;26(6):210–213. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2015-030

Table 2. Characteristics of patients with ophtalmic beta-blocker-induced conduction defects.

Patient’s age/gender Drug type Therapy duration (months) Conduction defect Temporary/permanent pacemeker
81/M Betaxolol 24 3rd-degree AV block Yes/Yes
58/F Timolol 40 Sinus pause No/Yes
78/F Timolol 52 3rd-degree AV block Yes/No*
82/M Timolol 14 High-degree AV block No/Yes
85/M Timolol 15 3rd-degree AV block No/Yes
62/F Timolol 61 Sinus pause No/No*
56/F Timolol 44 3rd-degree AV block No/Yes
62/M Cartelol 32 High-degree AV block No/Yes**
73/M Betaxolol 16 3rd-degree AV block No/Yes
83/F Betaxolol 18 High-degree AV block No/Yes
72/M Cartelol 11 3rd-degree AV block Yes/Yes
65/F Betaxolol 37 High-degree AV block No/Yes
76/M Timolol 27 3rd-degree AV block No/Yes

*Rhythm was improved and conduction disturbance never recurred after drug withdrawal; **Rhythm was improved but recurred one month after drug discontinuation. AV: atrioventricular.