Table 3.
Multivariable logistic regression analysis of relationships between skilled antenatal and delivery care and multiple vulnerabilities, Vietnam, 2000, 2006, and 2011
| Antenatal care by skilled staff | Birth with skilled attendant | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||||
| 2000 OR (95% CI) |
2006 OR (95% CI) |
2011 OR (95% CI) |
2000 OR (95% CI) |
2006 OR (95% CI) |
2011 OR (95% CI) |
|
| Three vulnerabilitiesa | ||||||
| Women with all three vulnerabilitiesa | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Women without any of the three vulnerabilitiesa | 7.86 (4.69–13.17) | 11.35 (6.94–18.56) | 14.13 (8.49–23.52) | 7.85 (4.69–13.14) | 19.47 (12.12–31.27) | 28.11 (16.62–47.54) |
| Four vulnerabilitiesb | ||||||
| Women with all four vulnerabilitiesb | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Women without any of the four vulnerabilitiesb | 19.98 (9.43–42.35) | 15.13 (9.07–25.22) | 23.34 (13.6–40.04) | 29.92 (12.01–74.52) | 31.6 (18.84–53.01) | 50.32 (28.23–89.70) |
Notes: ORs were adjusted for the age of the women; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
a
Three vulnerabilities: women having low education and belonging to the poorest quintile and living in a rural area.
b
Four vulnerabilities: women having low education and belonging to the poorest quintile and living in a rural area and identified as ethnic minority.