. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 7.

Published in final edited form as: Behav Res Methods. 2015 Dec;47(4):1178–1198. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0551-2

Table 3.

Confirmatory factor analysis of wrongness ratings

# of Factors	Description	χ²	df	χ²/df	RMSEA	90 % C.I.	AIC
2	Individualizing and binding	16,156.29	6, 553	2.47	.059	.058, .061	129,997.09
6	Original MFT, plus Liberty	13,607.23	6, 539	2.08	.051	.050, .052	127,476.03
7	Division of physical and emotional harm	12,933.23	6, 533	1.98	.049	.047, .050	126,814.03
7	Division of human and animal harm	12,893.93	6, 533	1.97	.048	.047, .050	126,774.73
8	Division of emotional, physical, animal harm	12,616.71	6, 526	1.93	.047	.046, .049	126,511.51

MFT, moral foundations theory. Boldface indicates the best-fitting model.