1 |
Moral justifications have an egocentric focus, which is based on obedience to higher authorities and potential consequences of their actions for themselves (e.g., punishment). Thinking at this level is inflexible; there is only one right/wrong way to act. |
• Because I could go to jail. |
2 |
Moral justifications are based on a concept of pragmatic deals or exchanging favours with others (‘fair deals’). Thinking is more flexible and is determined by context. The correct option is the one that is right for oneself (self-interest). |
• Because I might need his/her help in the future. |
3 |
Moral justifications have a focus on interpersonal relationships, a sense of ‘good-ness’, and feelings such as empathy and trust. Decisions are made with good motives and a prosocial perspective of the world. |
• Because he/she could get hurt. |
4 |
Moral justifications start to incorporate a broader view of morality; based on the compliance with rules, regulations and standards that society has established to ensure social order. |
• Because if everyone were to be unfaithful, relationships would not have any meaning. |
5 |
Moral justifications are characterized by the capacity to evaluate situations from various points of view to identify values involved in the specific situation in order to make the fairest decision. Protection of fundamental values and people’s rights is specific to this stage, even though these concepts are expressed very concretely. |
• Because people work hard for their things and we should respect their belongings. |