Table 1.
Mutation | LRRK2 construct | GTP binding | GTP hydrolysis | Prediction | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
N1437H | Full length | ↑ | ns | ↑ GTP-bound | Aasly et al., 2010 |
R1441C | Full length | ↑ | ns | ↑ GTP-bound | West et al., 2007 |
R1441C | Full length | — | ↓ | ↑ GTP-bound | Li et al., 2007 |
R1441C | Full length | — | ↓ | ↑ GTP-bound | Lewis et al., 2007 |
R1441C | Roc | ns | ↓ | ↑ GTP-bound | Deng et al., 2008 |
R1441C | Full length | ns | ↓ | ↑ GTP-bound | Xiong et al., 2010 |
R1441C | Roc, COR, kinase | — | — | No change | Xiong et al., 2010 |
R1441C | 970-2527 | ns | ↓ | ↑ GTP-bound | Pungaliya et al., 2010 |
R1441C | Full length | ↑ | ns | ↑ GTP-bound | Stafa et al., 2012 |
R1441G | Full length | ↑ | ns | ↑ GTP-bound | West et al., 2007 |
R1441G | Full length | — | ↓ | ↑ GTP-bound | Li et al., 2007 |
R1441G | Full length | ns | ↓ | ↑ GTP-bound | Xiong et al., 2010 |
R1441H | Roc | ↑ | ↓ | ↑ GTP-bound | Liao et al., 2014 |
“R1441”A | C. tepidum RocCOR | — | ↓ | ↑ GTP-bound | Gotthardt et al., 2008 |
Y1699C | Full length | ↑ | ns | ↑ GTP-bound | West et al., 2007 |
Y1699C | Full length | ns | ↓ | ↑ GTP-bound | Xiong et al., 2010 |
Y1699C | Full length | — | ↓ | ↑ GTP-bound | Daniëls et al., 2011 |
Y1699C | Full length | ↑ | ns | ↑ GTP-bound | Stafa et al., 2012 |
“Y1699”C | C. tepidum RocCOR | — | ↓ | ↑ GTP-bound | Gotthardt et al., 2008 |
Based on published data, the pathogenic N1437H, R1441C, R1441G, R1441H, and Y1699C mutations all elicit an increase in the fraction of GTP-bound LRRK2. Only one construct, an R1441C RocCOR-kinase, displayed no changes in GTP-binding or GTP hydrolysis; however, this mutation decreased GTPase activity in full length LRRK2 in the same publication. Note that mutations at residues equivalent to R1441 and Y1699 in C. tepidum Roco protein produce consistent results. Key: up and down arrows represent increases and decreases, respectively; dashes represent no change; ‘ns’ indicates ‘not studied.’