Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 23;2016:9561968. doi: 10.1155/2016/9561968

Table 3.

Comparison of the contralateral hindlimb angular displacement to control during locomotion at 4, 16, and 30 DAI.

CHL
Joint Control 4 DAI 16 DAI 30 DAI
INT IWOT p value IWT p value IWOT p value IWT p value IWOT p value IWT p value
Hip 100 135.5 ± 14.2 p < 0.5 64.09 ± 5.07 p < 0.05 135.8 ± 12.8 p < 0.05 73.2 ± 6.1 p < 0.05 100.7 ± 8.6 NS 110.5 ± 6.5 NS
Knee 100 112.5 ± 59.2 NS 109.1 ± 39.9 NS 103.8 ± 21 NS 103.6 ± 16.5 NS 108.9 ± 18.8 NS 90.96 ± 24.8 NS
Ankle 100 140.7 ± 18 NS 127.3 ± 41.3 NS 149.7 ± 53.2 NS 105.6 ± 36.5 NS 180.7 ± 80.6 NS 99.3 ± 18.5 p < 0.05
PLM 100 135.25 ± 14.8 p < 0.05 104.23 ± 5.1 NS 112 ± 12.5 NS 102.1 ± 10.1 NS 105.7 ± 3.6 NS 109.6 ± 6.3 NS

CHL, contralateral hindlimb; NS, not significant; INT, intact; IWT, injured with tamoxifen; IWOT, injured without tamoxifen; DAI, days after injury; denotes p < 0.05.