Skip to main content
. 2010 Feb 7;2:1–13. doi: 10.2147/EB.S7666

Table S1.

Total sample size and distribution for analysis of wild type growth cone collapse

Treatment Growth cones (n) Collapsed gc (n) Collapsed gc (%) Dishes (n) Mean collapse SEM Explants (n) Diff expts (n)
Control 2970 265 8.9% 14 9.4% 0.9% 101 11
0.1 nM LPA 746 229 30.7% 5 31.7% 7.0% 33 4
1 nM LPA 2189 840 38.4% 14 42.2% 5.0% 102 11
10 nM LPA 1304 1157 88.7% 13 89.4% 1.3% 94 10
100 nM LPA 762 744 97.6% 13 98.2% 0.5% 77 10
1 μM LPA 418 415 99.3% 6 98.8% 0.7% 34 5
10 μM LPA 532 528 99.2% 5 99.4% 0.4% 39 4
1 nM S1P 501 106 21.2% 3 21.0% 1.2% 24 3
10 nM S1P 366 66 18.0% 3 17.0% 1.5% 22 3
100 nM S1P 527 89 16.9% 3 16.3% 2.3% 25 3
1 μM S1P 900 151 16.8% 6 16.3% 2.5% 43 5

Notes: Mean collapse rate and SEM is per dish. “Diff expts” indicates independent experiments done on different days, in which each experiment included one or more animals whose retinal explants were pooled for that experiment.

Abbreviations: LPA, lysophosphatidic acid; S1P, sphingosine 1-phosphate; SEM, standard error of mean.