Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 9;114(5):562–570. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.17

Table 3. Relationship between MMR status and tumour microenvironment.

Tumour microenvironment All n=228 (%) MMR competent n=193 (%) dMMR n=35 (%) P-value
KM grade
Weak 77 (34) 63 (33) 14 (40) 0.398
Strong 151 (66) 130 (67) 21 (60)  
CD3 margin density (215)
Low 118 (55) 100 (55) 18 (56) 0.867
High 97 (45) 83 (45) 14 (44)  
CD3 cancer cell nest density (224)
Low 146 (65) 130 (69) 16 (46) 0.009
High 78 (35) 59 (31) 19 (54)  
CD8 margin density (216)
Low 127 (59) 105 (57) 22 (67) 0.319
High 9 (41) 78 (43) 11 (33)  
CD8 cancer cell nest density (222)
Low 161 (72) 140 (75) 21 (60) 0.071
High 61 (28) 47 (25) 14 (40)  
CD45R0 margin density (217)
Low 112 (52) 96 (53) 6 (47) 0.564
High 105 (48) 87 (47) 18 (53)  
CD45R0 cancer cell nest density (224)
Low 160 (71) 141 (75) 19 (54) 0.015
High 64 (29) 48 (25) 16 (46)  
FOXP3 margin density (216)
Low 126 (58) 104 (57) 22 (65) 0.413
High 90 (42) 78 (43) 12 (35)  
FOXP3 cancer cell nest density (219)
Low 110 (50) 92 (50) 18 (53) 0.731
High 109 (50) 93 (50) 16 (47)  
TSP (225)
Low 166 (74) 138 (72) 28 (85) 0.118
High 59 (26) 54 (28) 5 (15)  

Abbreviations: CRC=colorectal cancer; dMMR=mismatch repair deficient; KM=Klintrup–Mäkinen; MMR=mismatch repair; TSP=tumour stroma percentage. The relationship between MMR status and tumour microenvironment of patients undergoing elective, potentially curative resection of stage I–III CRC.