Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 3;6(4):e00448. doi: 10.1002/brb3.448

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Spatial pattern, intersession similarity and TRT reliability of KLS‐based morphological connectivity matrices. The mean KLS matrices (across participants) derived from session 1 (A) and session 2 (B) were highly correlated with each other, a robust finding against different choices of spatial smoothing and brain parcellation (C). TRT reliability analysis revealed high reliability for most elements in the matrices (D). KLS, KL divergence‐based similarity; ICC, intra‐class correlation; Nosmo, no smoothing; Smo, smoothing; AAL, Anatomical Automatic Labeling atlas; HOA, Harvard‐Oxford atlas.