Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 3;6(4):e00448. doi: 10.1002/brb3.448

Figure 10.

Figure 10

The test–retest (TRT) reliability of nodal centrality metrics under the Anatomical Automatic Labeling atlas (AAL) (A) and Harvard‐Oxford atlas (HOA) (B) parcellation schemes. Fair to excellent reliability (i.e., 0.4 < ICC < 1) was observed for almost all nodal centrality metrics under all analytical combinations of spatial smoothing, brain parcellation and network type. Notably, nodal degree and efficiency exhibited obviously higher reliability than nodal betwenness regardless of the parcellation schemes. ICC, intra‐class correlation; Bin, binary network; Wei, weighted network; Nosmo, no smoothing; Smo, smoothing.