Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 8;16:233. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2893-4

Table 4.

Association between network characteristics and the likelihood that an individual accepts IPV

Ego degree centrality Alter IPV* Alter degree centrality
Ego Highly connected −0.55**
(0.21)
Alter Support IPV 0.90
(0.14)****
Alter highly connected −0.05
(0.10)
Alter Support IPV* Alter highly connected −0.55***
(0.20)
Gender male −0.59*** −0.54**
(0.20) (0.20)
Income −0.34*** −0.33***
(0.13) (0.13)
Age in years 0.02** 0.01
(0.01) (0.01)
Education −0.04 −0.04
(0.15) (0.15)
Religion Ref = Catholic
 Evangelical −0.32 −0.24
(0.26) (0.25)
 None −0.03 0.05
(0.39) (0.38)
Marital Ref = Married
 Single 0.42 0.45
(0.32) (0.32)
 Civil Union 0.24 0.29
(0.25) (0.25)
 Separate or Divorce 0.09 0.20
(0.43) (0.44)
Village 0.40 0.31
(0.19) (0.20)
Num. obs. 9621 9621
Num. clust. 832 832

Multiple observations of the same individual adjusted for using GEE. Results of regressions of dependent variable equal to 1 if the subject accepted IPV, 0 otherwise and standard errors reported in parentheses

**** p < 0.001, *** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, * p < 0.10