Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 8;14:40. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0441-7

Table 2.

Unadjusted HRQoL mean scoresa, according to the frailty groups at 3 months and 6 months

Mean
(95 % CI)
Standard of Error P value
Physical Component Summary SF-12 scoreb
3 monthsc
- Very fit--well 69.6 (66.2 72.7) 21.9
- Well + comorbid--Apparently vulnerable 65.6(61.4 69.9) 21.4
- Mildly frail--Moderately frail 51.9 (43.9 59.9) 24.1 <0.001
6 months
- Very fit--well 70.2 (67.3 73.1) 17.8
- Well + comorbid--Apparently vulnerable 61.6 (56.7 66.4) 22.1
- Mildly frail--Moderately frail 50.5 (41.7–59.3) 23.1 <0.001
Mental Component Summary SF-12 scored
3 months
- Very fit--well 70.6 (68.1 73.1) 16.5
- Well + comorbid--Apparently vulnerable 64.5 (60.5–68.5) 20.3
- Mildly frail--Moderately frail 59.2 (51.7 66.8) 22.7 <0.001
6 months
- Very fit--well 71.0 (68.773.2)
- Well + comorbid--Apparently vulnerable 69.7 (66.0–73.5)
- Mildly frail--Moderately frail 59.6 (50.4–68.8) 0.003

aobtained by linear mixed model

bAdjustments based on schooling, comorbidities, use of walking aid, baseline IADL score, and number of outings per week

cVery fit—well (n = 173); Well + comorbid--Apparently vulnerable (n = 101); Mildly frail--Moderately frail (n = 37)

dAdjustments based on age, schooling, comorbidities, use of walking aid, baseline IADL score, cognitive status, and number of outings per week