Table VI.

Median log difference across configurations of bias, interval width, and RMSE of methods described in Section 1.4 versus MITSS, by interval estimates coverage for multivariate X (for all configurations with JSD < 0.3).

Method	Type	Percent	Absolute bias	Interval width	RMSE
MITSS-PS	A	41	0.27	0.15	0.27
	B	8	0.42	0.09	0.42
	C	22	0.19	0.38	0.19
	D	29	0.34	0.19	0.34
MITSS-15	A	61	0.41	0.52	0.41
	B	12	1.43	1.68	1.43
	C	2	0.21	0.35	0.21
	D	25	0.36	0.31	0.35
M–N–m	A	51	0.13	−0.13	0.13
	B	22	0.21	−0.37	0.21
	C	12	0.08	0.19	0.08
	D	15	0.18	−0.27	0.18
M–C–m	A	37	0.22	0.1	0.22
	B	10	0.36	0.02	0.36
	C	26	−0.12	0.09	−0.12
	D	27	0.1	−0.06	0.1
DR	A	46	0.28	1.05	0.28
	B	9	1.95	2.38	1.95
	C	17	−0.97	−0.39	−0.97
	D	28	−0.51	−0.09	−0.51
IPW1	A	39	2.85	3.68	2.85
	B	13	1.94	2.28	1.94
	C	24	1.73	3.13	1.77
	D	24	0.86	1.61	0.88
FM	A	48	0.21	0.03	0.21
	B	16	0.33	−0.15	0.33
	C	15	−0.08	0.00	−0.08
	D	21	−0.10	−0.44	−0.11

Differences are displayed as alternative methods to MITSS.

The types are configurations for which 95% interval estimates has the following coverages characteristics: A, MITSS ≥ 0.9 and Method ≥ 0.9; B, MITSS < 0.9 and Method ≥ 0.9; C, MITSS ≥ 0.9 and Method < 0.9; D, MITSS < 0.9 and Method < 0.9.